Screener update
Daily Variety reports today (link requires registration) that the major studios and the MPAA will reverse their ban on screeners, but only for Academy members. There will still be a ban on sending tapes and discs to critics and members of the various guilds. Daily Variety says that “an announcement is expected this week.”
The continuing ban on critics screeners is only likely to further anger professional critics, fueling their argument that this is really an effort to cut them out of the “Oscar buzz” game. The Los Angeles Film Critics Association announced at the weekend that it would cancel its year-end awards in protest. The group customarily gives out its awards in mid-December, and last year was the second major critics group to announce its winners, after the National Board of Review. (They later reversed themselves.)
I don’t think this was a wise move — canceling outright rather than announcing in January, though I understand the emotional satisfaction that kicking the studios in the teeth might give. For one thing, canceling tends to suggest that the group’s real agenda is not to honor the best films, but affect the Oscar race. Now, the latter is not a bad thing in itself, and most years I prefer the LA critics circle winners to those of the Academy — so they’re pushing the Academy in a direction I generally approve. But to cancel the awards outright rather than giving them in January is throwing the baby (honoring the best films) out with the bathwater (influencing the Academy).
Further, I’m not so sure that, for pro critics, screeners affect their ability to see the December Oscar bait *that much.* I know pro critics who avoid looking at tapes or discs as much as they can, and still see every film at a critics screening by early or mid-December. Screeners are certainly convenient, especially for repeat viewings and making up a missed screening, but hardly necessary.
October 21, 2003 - Posted by vjmorton | Uncategorized | business of movies, metacriticism, Oscars, polls
No comments yet.
About
Reviews and thoughts about the films of the cinema from an American conservative whose favorite Austrian film artist is Michael Haneke rather than Arnold Schwarzenegger.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Glass Onion: Everyth… on Liberalism as product pla… sarah on Michael Moore becomes a j… vjmorton on Toronto 2012 — day 5… Sam D Cobray on Toronto 2012 — day 5… vjmorton on Charlton Heston can’t… D R Smith on Charlton Heston can’t… Frank Beef on Jake LaMotta and RAGING B… John Thacker on Songs of innocence; songs of… Seth Kaminski on A godless atonement Robert Dempster on Robert McDermott, 1960-2015 Pages
Archives
- September 2021
- April 2021
- February 2021
- June 2020
- February 2018
- September 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- May 2015
- October 2014
- April 2013
- January 2013
- September 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- February 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- June 2011
- April 2011
- January 2011
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- July 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- June 2005
- March 2005
- October 2004
- September 2004
- July 2004
- April 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
Wide release
Limited release
My Twitter feed
- @TheEndofCinema Clearly trying to get you drunk and take advantage of you 5 hours ago
Leave a Reply